Author Archive

The even more mysterious N≡N triple bond in a nitric oxide dimer.

Monday, August 18th, 2025

Previously, I pondered about the strange N=N double bond in nitrosobenzene dimer[1] as a follow up to commenting on the curly arrow mechanism of the dimerisation.[2] By the same curly arrow method, one can produce the below, showing how the simpler nitric oxide radical could potentially dimerise to a species with a N≡N triple bond! This involves a total of six electrons entering the N-N region, and hence raises the question of whether these all move in a single concerted/synchronous bond forming reaction, or whether they might go in (asynchronous) stages. Here are some calculations[3]) which might shed some light on this aspect.

(more…)

References

  1. H. Rzepa, "The mysterious N=N double bond in nitrosobenzene dimer.", 2025. https://doi.org/10.59350/rzepa.29383
  2. H. Rzepa, "Mechanism of the dimerisation of Nitrosobenzene.", 2025. https://doi.org/10.59350/rzepa.28849
  3. H. Rzepa, "N2O2 as strong dimer TS as biradical cis, G = -259.785500", 2025. https://doi.org/10.14469/hpc/15483

Energy decomposition analysis of hindered alkenes: Tetra t-butylethene and others.

Wednesday, August 13th, 2025

In the previous post,[1] I introduced the N=N double bond in nitrosobenzene dimer, arguing that even though it was a formal double bond, its bond dissociation energy made it nonetheless a very weak double bond! This was backed up by a technique known as energy decomposition analysis or EDA. Here I use a variant of this method  known as  NEDA to look at some other strained alkenes, including the famously non-existent tetra t-Butyl ethene.

(more…)

References

  1. H. Rzepa, "The mysterious N=N double bond in nitrosobenzene dimer.", 2025. https://doi.org/10.59350/rzepa.29383

The mysterious N=N double bond in nitrosobenzene dimer.

Monday, August 11th, 2025

In an earlier blog, I discussed[1] the curly arrows associated with the known dimerisation of nitrosobenzene, and how the N=N double bond (shown in red below) forms in a single concerted process.

(more…)

References

  1. H. Rzepa, "Mechanism of the dimerisation of Nitrosobenzene.", 2025. https://doi.org/10.59350/rzepa.28849

Why an Electron-Withdrawing Group is an o, m-Director rather than m-Director in Electrophilic Aromatic Substitution: The example of CN vs NC.

Tuesday, July 22nd, 2025

In the previous post[1] I followed up on an article published on the theme “Physical Organic Chemistry: Never Out of Style“.[2] Paul Rablen presented the case that the amount of o (ortho) product in electrophilic substitution of a phenyl ring bearing an EWG (electron withdrawing group) is often large enough to merit changing the long held rule-of-thumb for EWGs from being just meta directors into being ortho and meta-directors, with a preference for meta. I showed how Paul’s elegant insight could be complemented by an NBO7 analysis of the donor-acceptor interactions in the σ-complex formed by protonating the phenyl ring bearing the EWG. Both the o– and m– isomers showed similar NBO orbital patterns and associated E(2) donor/acceptor interaction energies and also matched the observation that the proportion of meta is modestly greater than ortho substitution (steric effects not modelled). These interactions were both very different from those calculated for the para isomer.

(more…)

References

  1. H. Rzepa, ""Typical Electron-Withdrawing Groups Are o, m-Directors Rather than m-Directors in Electrophilic Aromatic Substitution"", 2025. https://doi.org/10.59350/rzepa.28993
  2. P.R. Rablen, "Typical Electron-Withdrawing Groups Are <i>ortho</i>, <i>meta</i>-Directors Rather than <i>meta</i>-Directors in Electrophilic Aromatic Substitution", The Journal of Organic Chemistry, vol. 90, pp. 6090-6093, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.joc.5c00426

“Typical Electron-Withdrawing Groups Are o, m-Directors Rather than m-Directors in Electrophilic Aromatic Substitution”

Thursday, July 17th, 2025

The title of this post comes from an article published in a special virtual issue on the theme “Physical Organic Chemistry: Never Out of Style[1] There, Paul Rablen presents the case that the amount of o (ortho) product in electrophilic substitution of a phenyl ring bearing an EWG (electron withdrawing group) is often large enough to merit changing the long held rule-of-thumb for EWGs from being just meta directors into these substituents are best understood as ortho, meta-directors, with a preference for meta. I cannot help but add here a citation[2] to the earliest publication I can find showing tables of both o,p and m-directing groups and dating from 1887, so this rule is 138 years old (at least).

(more…)

References

  1. P.R. Rablen, "Typical Electron-Withdrawing Groups Are <i>ortho</i>, <i>meta</i>-Directors Rather than <i>meta</i>-Directors in Electrophilic Aromatic Substitution", The Journal of Organic Chemistry, vol. 90, pp. 6090-6093, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.joc.5c00426
  2. H.E. Armstrong, "XXVIII.—An explanation of the laws which govern substitution in the case of benzenoid compounds", J. Chem. Soc., Trans., vol. 51, pp. 258-268, 1887. https://doi.org/10.1039/ct8875100258

WATOC 2025 report – extending the limits of computation (accuracy).

Wednesday, June 25th, 2025

This are just a few insights I have got from some of the talks I attended. As usual, this does not represent a report on the WATOC congress itself, but simply some aspects that caught my personal eye. (more…)

WATOC25 and its (Dr Who like) regeneration to Young WATOC25.

Saturday, June 21st, 2025

The WATOC congresses occur every three years. WATOC25, the 13th in a series which started in 1987  takes places tomorrow in Oslo, Norway, The day before the main event there is something new – a session just for early career researchers or “Young WATOC”. As an “old” WATOCer, I dropped into the opening session and was delighted to find a packed auditorium, with literally standing room only comprising mostly young researchers in their 20s.

(more…)

Mechanism of the dimerisation of Nitrosobenzene.

Saturday, June 14th, 2025

I am in the process of revising my annual lecture to first year university students on the topic of “curly arrows”. I like to start my story in 1924, when Robert Robinson published the very first example[1] as an illustration of why nitrosobenzene undergoes electrophilic bromination in the para position of the benzene ring. I follow this up by showing how “data mining” can be used to see if this supports his assertion. I have used the very latest version of the CSD crystal structure database to update the version originally posted here in 2020.[2]

(more…)

References

  1. "Forthcoming events", Journal of the Society of Chemical Industry, vol. 43, pp. 1295-1298, 1924. https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.5000435208
  2. H. Rzepa, "The first ever curly arrows. Revisited with some crystal structure mining.", 2020. https://doi.org/10.59350/c6thp-wqe69

How many of the compounds that appear in the chemical literature are mentioned just once?

Friday, June 6th, 2025

Tom recently emailed me this question: Do you know how to find out how many of the compounds that appear in the chemical literature are mentioned just once? Intrigued, I first set out to find out how many substances, as Chemical Abstracts refers to the them, there were as of 5 June, 2025. There is a static estimate here (219 million), but to get the most up to date information, I asked CAS directly. They responded immediately (thanks Lee!) with 294,778,693 on the date mentioned above. It is not actually possible to answer the first question itself using CAS SciFinder, but again CAS came up with a value: “there are 113,383,649 substances in CAS Registry with only one CAplus citation” equivalent to  “38.5% of the current substances have only 1 reference.” I should add this estimate was qualified by “that can be misleading, since that includes salts, multicomponents, etc. But that’s a first pass.” I am actually impressed that as many as 61.5% are mentioned more than once, since before learning the answer, I had intuitively guessed that percentage as being much lower.

(more…)

Cyclo-S6 (Hexathiane) – anomeric effects again!

Sunday, June 1st, 2025

I thought I was done with exploring anomeric effects in small sulfur rings. However, I then realised that all the systems that I had described had an odd number of atoms and that I had not looked at any even numbered rings. Thus hexasulfur is a smaller (known) ring version of S8, the latter by far the best known allotrope of this element of course.

(more…)