{"id":21546,"date":"2019-12-06T17:05:48","date_gmt":"2019-12-06T17:05:48","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.ch.imperial.ac.uk\/rzepa\/blog\/?p=21546"},"modified":"2020-12-13T08:31:21","modified_gmt":"2020-12-13T08:31:21","slug":"the-in-d-glyceraldehyde-means-it-has-a-positive-optical-rotation-wrong","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.ch.ic.ac.uk\/rzepa\/blog\/?p=21546","title":{"rendered":"The (+) in D-(+)-glyceraldehyde means it has a positive optical rotation? Wrong!"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"kcite-section\" kcite-section-id=\"21546\">\n<p>Text books often show the following diagram, famously consolidated over many years by Emil Fischer from 1891 onwards. At the top sits <span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"><strong>D<\/strong><\/span>-(+)-glyceraldehyde, to which all the monosaccharides below are connected by painstaking chemical transformations.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ch.ic.ac.uk\/rzepa\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/12\/Fischer.svg\"><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-21547\" src=\"https:\/\/www.ch.ic.ac.uk\/rzepa\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/12\/Fischer.svg\" alt=\"\" width=\"540\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>In this notation, <strong><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">D<\/span><\/strong> (for all these structures) indicates the absolute configuration of the series, deriving from placing the last highest priority group before an achiral carbon at the bottom of the representation (the hydroxyl group) to the <em>right<\/em> of the diagram (= dextro = <span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"><strong>D<\/strong><\/span>). The mirror images of all these species would be designated <strong><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">L<\/span><\/strong> (since the hydroxide group would now be on the left). The challenge emerges in connecting this absolute configuration to some measurable property, and during the late 19th century, the only feasible measurement would be the sign of the optical rotation. It was decided that since no method existed at the time to connect absolute configuration to the sign of optical rotation, <span style=\"color: #3366ff;\"><strong>D<\/strong><\/span>-glyceraldehyde (nowadays more commonly referred to by its CIP notatation (<em>R<\/em>)-glyceraldehyde), would be by convention connected to the enantiomer giving a positive rotation, hence <span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"><strong>D<\/strong><\/span>-(+)-glyceraldehyde. This species has indeed mostly been reported as having a small positive rotation of <em>e.g.<\/em> +9.2<span id=\"cite_ITEM-21546-0\" name=\"citation\"><a href=\"#ITEM-21546-0\">[1]<\/a><\/span> in water. If a future procedure were to confirm that the D-enantiomer had a positive rotation, Fischer&#8217;s guess would be proven correct. Possibly.<\/p>\n<p>I quickly mention that this experiment was of course carried out in 1951, as noted in the previous post<span id=\"cite_ITEM-21546-1\" name=\"citation\"><a href=\"#ITEM-21546-1\">[2]<\/a><\/span>, but on a rubidium tartrate salt and not on glyceraldehyde itself (which is a liquid). Since the two could be connected by chemical synthesis, Fischer&#8217;s guess was indeed confirmed as correct. This proof rapidly made <span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"><strong>D<\/strong><\/span>-(+)-glyceraldehyde less relevant as the tentpole of absolute configuration (in sugars) and people stopped worrying about it. But the assertion that the D\/(<i>R)<\/i> enantiomer has a positive rotation by indicating (+) continues in all the diagrams related to the above that I have come across. So is it correct?<\/p>\n<p>Well, an earlier attempt in 1937 to assign optical rotation to absolute configuration had been attempted by Kirkwood<span id=\"cite_ITEM-21546-2\" name=\"citation\"><a href=\"#ITEM-21546-2\">[3]<\/a><\/span> using quantum mechanical theory to make that connection. I thought I might apply the modern version of that approach to (<em>R<\/em>)-glyceraldehyde, using the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ch.imperial.ac.uk\/rzepa\/blog\/?p=21499\">same procedure<\/a> I had tried earlier. A conformational analysis of the molecule, followed by dispersion-corrected calculation of free energies and then of the optical rotations gives the following table. Data is at <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.14469\/hpc\/6436\">10.14469\/hpc\/6436<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ch.ic.ac.uk\/rzepa\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/12\/glyceraldehyde-rotations-1.jpg\"><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-21577\" src=\"https:\/\/www.ch.ic.ac.uk\/rzepa\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/12\/glyceraldehyde-rotations-1-1024x310.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"540\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.ch.ic.ac.uk\/rzepa\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/12\/glyceraldehyde-rotations-1-1024x310.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/www.ch.ic.ac.uk\/rzepa\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/12\/glyceraldehyde-rotations-1-300x91.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.ch.ic.ac.uk\/rzepa\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/12\/glyceraldehyde-rotations-1-768x233.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.ch.ic.ac.uk\/rzepa\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/12\/glyceraldehyde-rotations-1-1536x465.jpg 1536w, https:\/\/www.ch.ic.ac.uk\/rzepa\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/12\/glyceraldehyde-rotations-1.jpg 1816w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/><\/a>These calculations show that the rotation is strongly negative! Can they be in serious error? Perhaps however there are two different species in solution. Indeed, the equilibrium below is shown to favour the rhs for aldehydes, as shown by the following concentration profile as a function of temperature.<span id=\"cite_ITEM-21546-3\" name=\"citation\"><a href=\"#ITEM-21546-3\">[4]<\/a><\/span> This shows that at 30\u00b0, only 4% of this molecule is in the aldehyde form.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ch.ic.ac.uk\/rzepa\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/12\/diol.svg\"><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-21556\" src=\"https:\/\/www.ch.ic.ac.uk\/rzepa\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/12\/diol.svg\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ch.ic.ac.uk\/rzepa\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/12\/glyceraldehyde-concentrations-scaled.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-21557\" src=\"https:\/\/www.ch.ic.ac.uk\/rzepa\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/12\/glyceraldehyde-concentrations-1024x481.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"450\" height=\"211\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.ch.ic.ac.uk\/rzepa\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/12\/glyceraldehyde-concentrations-1024x481.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/www.ch.ic.ac.uk\/rzepa\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/12\/glyceraldehyde-concentrations-300x141.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.ch.ic.ac.uk\/rzepa\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/12\/glyceraldehyde-concentrations-768x361.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.ch.ic.ac.uk\/rzepa\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/12\/glyceraldehyde-concentrations-1536x722.jpg 1536w, https:\/\/www.ch.ic.ac.uk\/rzepa\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/12\/glyceraldehyde-concentrations-2048x963.jpg 2048w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 450px) 100vw, 450px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>The article also reports optical rotations, at three wavelengths. I should note here that the notation (+) means only the rotation at 589nm (yes, you can get sign inversions on moving from one wavelength to another!<span id=\"cite_ITEM-21546-4\" name=\"citation\"><a href=\"#ITEM-21546-4\">[5]<\/a><\/span>). At 30\u00b0 the observed rotation for <span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"><strong>D<\/strong><\/span>-glyceraldehyde is indeed strongly negative, whilst it is the hydrated form that is moderately (+).<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ch.ic.ac.uk\/rzepa\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/12\/glyceraldehyde-rotations-scaled.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-21552\" src=\"https:\/\/www.ch.ic.ac.uk\/rzepa\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/12\/glyceraldehyde-rotations-1024x530.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"450\" height=\"233\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.ch.ic.ac.uk\/rzepa\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/12\/glyceraldehyde-rotations-1024x530.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/www.ch.ic.ac.uk\/rzepa\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/12\/glyceraldehyde-rotations-300x155.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.ch.ic.ac.uk\/rzepa\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/12\/glyceraldehyde-rotations-768x398.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.ch.ic.ac.uk\/rzepa\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/12\/glyceraldehyde-rotations-1536x795.jpg 1536w, https:\/\/www.ch.ic.ac.uk\/rzepa\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/12\/glyceraldehyde-rotations-2048x1061.jpg 2048w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 450px) 100vw, 450px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>There is a discrepancy of ~47\u00b0 between these measured values and the calculated one at 589nm. I hope to explore the origins of this error in <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ch.imperial.ac.uk\/rzepa\/blog\/?p=21579\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">a separate post<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>So we see by both experiment and theory that <span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"><strong>D<\/strong><\/span>-(+)-glyceraldehyde, if the meaning of that (+) is to be upheld, should really be <span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"><strong>D<\/strong><\/span>-(-)-glyceraldehyde. Note that many of the sugars shown in the top diagram have (-) as well as (+), and so there is no reason that glyceraldehyde should be any different.<\/p>\n<h2>References<\/h2>\n    <ol class=\"kcite-bibliography csl-bib-body\"><li id=\"ITEM-21546-0\">H.J. Lamble, M.J. Danson, D.W. Hough, and S.D. Bull, \"Engineering stereocontrol into an aldolase-catalysed reaction\", <i>Chemical Communications<\/i>, pp. 124, 2005. <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1039\/b413255f\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1039\/b413255f<\/a>\n\n<\/li>\n<li id=\"ITEM-21546-1\">J.M. BIJVOET, A.F. PEERDEMAN, and A.J. van BOMMEL, \"Determination of the Absolute Configuration of Optically Active Compounds by Means of X-Rays\", <i>Nature<\/i>, vol. 168, pp. 271-272, 1951. <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/168271a0\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/168271a0<\/a>\n\n<\/li>\n<li id=\"ITEM-21546-2\">J.G. Kirkwood, \"On the Theory of Optical Rotatory Power\", <i>The Journal of Chemical Physics<\/i>, vol. 5, pp. 479-491, 1937. <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1063\/1.1750060\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1063\/1.1750060<\/a>\n\n<\/li>\n<li id=\"ITEM-21546-3\">M. Fedoro\u0148ko, \"Optical activity of D-glyceraldehyde in aqueous solutions\", <i>Collection of Czechoslovak Chemical Communications<\/i>, vol. 49, pp. 1167-1172, 1984. <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1135\/cccc19841167\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1135\/cccc19841167<\/a>\n\n<\/li>\n<li id=\"ITEM-21546-4\">M.S. Andrade, V.S. Silva, A.M. Louren\u00e7o, A.M. Lobo, and H.S. Rzepa, \"Chiroptical Properties of Streptorubin B: The Synergy Between Theory and Experiment\", <i>Chirality<\/i>, vol. 27, pp. 745-751, 2015. <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/chir.22486\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/chir.22486<\/a>\n\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n<\/div> <!-- kcite-section 21546 -->","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Text books often show the following diagram, famously consolidated over many years by Emil Fischer from 1891 onwards. At the top sits D-(+)-glyceraldehyde, to which all the monosaccharides below are connected by painstaking chemical transformations. In this notation, D (for all these structures) indicates the absolute configuration of the series, deriving from placing the last [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"activitypub_content_warning":"","activitypub_content_visibility":"","activitypub_max_image_attachments":5,"activitypub_interaction_policy_quote":"anyone","activitypub_status":"","footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[2644,565],"tags":[],"ppma_author":[2661],"class_list":["post-21546","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-chiroptics","category-historical"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>The (+) in D-(+)-glyceraldehyde means it has a positive optical rotation? Wrong! - Henry Rzepa&#039;s Blog<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.ch.ic.ac.uk\/rzepa\/blog\/?p=21546\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_GB\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"The (+) in D-(+)-glyceraldehyde means it has a positive optical rotation? Wrong! - Henry Rzepa&#039;s Blog\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Text books often show the following diagram, famously consolidated over many years by Emil Fischer from 1891 onwards. At the top sits D-(+)-glyceraldehyde, to which all the monosaccharides below are connected by painstaking chemical transformations. In this notation, D (for all these structures) indicates the absolute configuration of the series, deriving from placing the last [&hellip;]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.ch.ic.ac.uk\/rzepa\/blog\/?p=21546\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Henry Rzepa&#039;s Blog\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-12-06T17:05:48+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2020-12-13T08:31:21+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.ch.ic.ac.uk\/rzepa\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/12\/Fischer.svg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Henry Rzepa\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Henry Rzepa\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Estimated reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"The (+) in D-(+)-glyceraldehyde means it has a positive optical rotation? Wrong! - Henry Rzepa&#039;s Blog","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.ch.ic.ac.uk\/rzepa\/blog\/?p=21546","og_locale":"en_GB","og_type":"article","og_title":"The (+) in D-(+)-glyceraldehyde means it has a positive optical rotation? Wrong! - Henry Rzepa&#039;s Blog","og_description":"Text books often show the following diagram, famously consolidated over many years by Emil Fischer from 1891 onwards. At the top sits D-(+)-glyceraldehyde, to which all the monosaccharides below are connected by painstaking chemical transformations. In this notation, D (for all these structures) indicates the absolute configuration of the series, deriving from placing the last [&hellip;]","og_url":"https:\/\/www.ch.ic.ac.uk\/rzepa\/blog\/?p=21546","og_site_name":"Henry Rzepa&#039;s Blog","article_published_time":"2019-12-06T17:05:48+00:00","article_modified_time":"2020-12-13T08:31:21+00:00","og_image":[{"url":"https:\/\/www.ch.ic.ac.uk\/rzepa\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/12\/Fischer.svg","type":"","width":"","height":""}],"author":"Henry Rzepa","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Henry Rzepa","Estimated reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.ch.ic.ac.uk\/rzepa\/blog\/?p=21546#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.ch.ic.ac.uk\/rzepa\/blog\/?p=21546"},"author":{"name":"Henry Rzepa","@id":"https:\/\/www.ch.ic.ac.uk\/rzepa\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/2b40f7b9c872a4dc1547e040a11b6281"},"headline":"The (+) in D-(+)-glyceraldehyde means it has a positive optical rotation? Wrong!","datePublished":"2019-12-06T17:05:48+00:00","dateModified":"2020-12-13T08:31:21+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.ch.ic.ac.uk\/rzepa\/blog\/?p=21546"},"wordCount":627,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.ch.ic.ac.uk\/rzepa\/blog\/?p=21546#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.ch.ic.ac.uk\/rzepa\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/12\/Fischer.svg","articleSection":["Chiroptics","Historical"],"inLanguage":"en-GB","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.ch.ic.ac.uk\/rzepa\/blog\/?p=21546#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.ch.ic.ac.uk\/rzepa\/blog\/?p=21546","url":"https:\/\/www.ch.ic.ac.uk\/rzepa\/blog\/?p=21546","name":"The (+) in D-(+)-glyceraldehyde means it has a positive optical rotation? Wrong! - Henry Rzepa&#039;s Blog","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.ch.ic.ac.uk\/rzepa\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.ch.ic.ac.uk\/rzepa\/blog\/?p=21546#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.ch.ic.ac.uk\/rzepa\/blog\/?p=21546#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.ch.ic.ac.uk\/rzepa\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/12\/Fischer.svg","datePublished":"2019-12-06T17:05:48+00:00","dateModified":"2020-12-13T08:31:21+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.ch.ic.ac.uk\/rzepa\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/2b40f7b9c872a4dc1547e040a11b6281"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.ch.ic.ac.uk\/rzepa\/blog\/?p=21546#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-GB","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.ch.ic.ac.uk\/rzepa\/blog\/?p=21546"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/www.ch.ic.ac.uk\/rzepa\/blog\/?p=21546#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.ch.ic.ac.uk\/rzepa\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/12\/Fischer.svg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.ch.ic.ac.uk\/rzepa\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/12\/Fischer.svg"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.ch.ic.ac.uk\/rzepa\/blog\/?p=21546#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.ch.ic.ac.uk\/rzepa\/blog"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"The (+) in D-(+)-glyceraldehyde means it has a positive optical rotation? Wrong!"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.ch.ic.ac.uk\/rzepa\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.ch.ic.ac.uk\/rzepa\/blog\/","name":"Henry Rzepa&#039;s Blog","description":"Chemistry with a twist","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.ch.ic.ac.uk\/rzepa\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-GB"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.ch.ic.ac.uk\/rzepa\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/2b40f7b9c872a4dc1547e040a11b6281","name":"Henry Rzepa","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/897b6740f7f599bca7942cdf7d7914af5988937ae0e3869ab09aebb87f26a731?s=96&d=blank&r=g370be3a7397865e4fd161aefeb0a5a85","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/897b6740f7f599bca7942cdf7d7914af5988937ae0e3869ab09aebb87f26a731?s=96&d=blank&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/897b6740f7f599bca7942cdf7d7914af5988937ae0e3869ab09aebb87f26a731?s=96&d=blank&r=g","caption":"Henry Rzepa"},"description":"Henry Rzepa is Emeritus Professor of Computational Chemistry at Imperial College London.","sameAs":["https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-8635-8390"],"url":"https:\/\/www.ch.ic.ac.uk\/rzepa\/blog\/?author=1"}]}},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/pDef7-5Bw","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"authors":[{"term_id":2661,"user_id":1,"is_guest":0,"slug":"admin","display_name":"Henry Rzepa","avatar_url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/897b6740f7f599bca7942cdf7d7914af5988937ae0e3869ab09aebb87f26a731?s=96&d=blank&r=g","0":null,"1":"","2":"","3":"","4":"","5":"","6":"","7":"","8":""}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ch.ic.ac.uk\/rzepa\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21546","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ch.ic.ac.uk\/rzepa\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ch.ic.ac.uk\/rzepa\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ch.ic.ac.uk\/rzepa\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ch.ic.ac.uk\/rzepa\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=21546"}],"version-history":[{"count":24,"href":"https:\/\/www.ch.ic.ac.uk\/rzepa\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21546\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":23106,"href":"https:\/\/www.ch.ic.ac.uk\/rzepa\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21546\/revisions\/23106"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ch.ic.ac.uk\/rzepa\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=21546"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ch.ic.ac.uk\/rzepa\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=21546"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ch.ic.ac.uk\/rzepa\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=21546"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ch.ic.ac.uk\/rzepa\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fppma_author&post=21546"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}